Score every bullet on phrasing, evidence and length — and see how to fix it.
Scored as you type, entirely in this tab. Nothing is sent anywhere.
These checks are mechanical: phrasing, quantification, length and repetition. They cannot judge whether an achievement is impressive or whether a number is true — a bullet can score 100 here and still be the wrong thing to put on the page.
A strong resume bullet opens with an action verb and ends with a measurable outcome. This scorer checks each of yours for weak openers like "responsible for", missing numbers, clichés, passive voice and length, and gives the specific edit that fixes each one.
Three things: it opens with an action verb rather than a duty ("Migrated", not "Responsible for migrating"), it names a measurable outcome, and it stays under about 30 words. A bullet with all three tells a recruiter what changed because you were there.
Most work has a measurable side even when nobody tracked it — how many users, how many services, how long something took before and after, how big the team was. A defensible estimate you can explain in an interview beats no number at all. Never invent one you cannot stand behind.
Because every applicant writes them, so they carry no information and take space a result could occupy. Recruiters skim past self-description and look for evidence — showing collaboration through an outcome is what the phrase was trying and failing to do.
No. These checks are mechanical — phrasing, quantification, length, repetition. They cannot judge whether an achievement is relevant to the job, whether the number is true, or whether the bullet belongs on the page at all. Use it to catch weak writing, not to decide what to say.
21 categories · pick one to explore
Real journeys from the SkillVeris community — swipe for more.